I'm very grateful to the person (the colourfully named 'blue') for what they wrote about Locke. This is because it allowed me to see somewhere else in the world an echo of a thought I often have with regard to my step son.
As anyone will tell you, being a step parent is bloody hard; it's like... you get all the responsibilities of being a parent but without the love in return... because at the end of the day, you don't have the genes and that lifelong history to bind you, and the kid always sees you as an outsider. Anyway, the point about Locke is that what he's saying about changing outside behaviour by force but not changing inner behaviour is totally true.
After drumming into my step-son the various tenets of basic discipline and respect - a process which involves endless discussions, punishments and general problems, he co-operates. However, his co-operation is only paper thin and worse I get the feeling that he utterly resents this discipline and, like the slaves in the Locke piece, only participates in an outer show of co-operation while inside he feels hatred and rebellion.
Unfortunately, I don't know if my suspicion is founded because he keeps his cards close to his chest. It's as if to express his feelings - even of resentment - would be giving me something of himself and he doesn't want to give me that.
As Blue said, I'll never know what he's thinking... he refuses to talk.
The reason this cuts me up is that I want him to co-operate outwardly and inwardly because when I talk about discipline I'm not talking about an iron rod and a set of intricate, petty rules, I'm just talking about basic things ... please thank-you, responding when spoken to. In the old days, it seems to me, you resented the oldies telling you what to do... but deep down you knew they were right and respected them on some level. These days, though, it seems that my step son represents the youth of today... they just won't accept anyone telling them what to do even if what they're being told is morally correct; and they won't accept this because it contravenes their most important moral and philosophical tenet - individualism: nobody can tell anyone else what to do.
So, once again 'Blue' thanks for bringing it up.
As anyone will tell you, being a step parent is bloody hard; it's like... you get all the responsibilities of being a parent but without the love in return... because at the end of the day, you don't have the genes and that lifelong history to bind you, and the kid always sees you as an outsider. Anyway, the point about Locke is that what he's saying about changing outside behaviour by force but not changing inner behaviour is totally true.
After drumming into my step-son the various tenets of basic discipline and respect - a process which involves endless discussions, punishments and general problems, he co-operates. However, his co-operation is only paper thin and worse I get the feeling that he utterly resents this discipline and, like the slaves in the Locke piece, only participates in an outer show of co-operation while inside he feels hatred and rebellion.
Unfortunately, I don't know if my suspicion is founded because he keeps his cards close to his chest. It's as if to express his feelings - even of resentment - would be giving me something of himself and he doesn't want to give me that.
As Blue said, I'll never know what he's thinking... he refuses to talk.
The reason this cuts me up is that I want him to co-operate outwardly and inwardly because when I talk about discipline I'm not talking about an iron rod and a set of intricate, petty rules, I'm just talking about basic things ... please thank-you, responding when spoken to. In the old days, it seems to me, you resented the oldies telling you what to do... but deep down you knew they were right and respected them on some level. These days, though, it seems that my step son represents the youth of today... they just won't accept anyone telling them what to do even if what they're being told is morally correct; and they won't accept this because it contravenes their most important moral and philosophical tenet - individualism: nobody can tell anyone else what to do.
So, once again 'Blue' thanks for bringing it up.